Encyclopedia  |   World Factbook  |   World Flags  |   Reference Tables  |   List of Lists     
   Academic Disciplines  |   Historical Timeline  |   Themed Timelines  |   Biographies  |   How-Tos     
Your Ad Here
Sponsor by The Tattoo Collection


No hair theorem
Main Page | See live article | Alphabetical index

No hair theorem

In astrophysics, the no-hair theorem states that black holes are completely characterized only by three externally observable parameters: mass, electrical charge, and angular momentum. All other information about the matter which formed a black hole or infalling into it, 'disappear' behind the black-hole event horizon and are therefore permanently inaccessible to external observers. Thus the statement "Black holes have no hair", that is, there are no features that distinguish one black hole from another, other than mass, charge, and angular momentum.

For example, if we "construct" two black holes with the same masses, electrical charges, and angular momenta, but will make the first black hole out of ordinary matter, and the second one out of anti-matter, they would be completely indistinguishable - none of the special particle physics pseudo-charges (baryonic, leptonic, etc) is conserved in the black hole.

It should be noted, however, that not all theoreticians believe that the "no hair" holds completely. For example, Penrose argues that at least some of the information "lost" at the event horizon will be recovered during the process of black hole evaporation.

In July 2004 Stephen Hawking presented a new theory about black holes which goes against his own long-held belief in the no-hair theorem. Hawking says the problem with the no hair theorem is that it implies the black hole will emit the same radiation regardless of what goes into the black hole. So if you throw a pure quantum state into a black hole, you will get out a mixed state. This runs counter to the rules of quantum mechanics and is known as the black hole information paradox.